|
Name: ___________________19th century Art - Midterm Exam
WRITE YOUR ESSAYS IN THE BLUEBOOK.
PART 1 - Unknowns - attribute each slide to a style (be as specific
as possible) AND an artist. In your blue book write a "defense"
or "argument" for your attribution, using specific stylistic characteristics,
subject matter etc. and KNOWN WORKS for justification. I will grade
you primarily on your "thought process" in creating the argument
rather than simply on whether or not you were "correct." i.e. the
attribution itself counts for very little pointswise. What you write
explaining your choice does. I will deduct points for "mistakes"
in agreement between artist/style; artist/country etc. Be as specific
as possible to achieve full points.
1. (left)
2. (right)
3. (left)
4. (right)
PART 2 - Short Answer- Indicate the style of the following, then,
in a few healthy, meaty sentences answer the question pertaining
to each of the following slides. (Indicate the style here; Write
the sentences in your blue book)
5. (left) Girodet, Portrait of J. J. Belley, 1797
style:
describe the dual nature of the subject matter (think historical
context).
6. (right) Daumier, Rue Transnonain, April 15, 1834
style:
describe the dual nature of the style (think historical context).
7. (left) Hunt, The Awakening Conscience, 1853
style:
describe the subject matter as expressing a specific theoretical
viewpoint of the artist.
8. (right) Gros, Napoleon at the Pesthouse in Jaffa, 1806
style:
describe the purpose of this painting, giving specific examples
from the work itself.
9. (left) Ingres, Portrait of Mme. Riviere, 1805
style:
describe the artist's goals in (especially female) portraiture.
10. (right) David, Oath of the Horatii, 1784
style:
describe the significance of the moment depicted to stimulate a
specific response from viewers (think historical context)
11. (left) Goya, The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters,
ca. 1799
style:
describe two equally feasible interpretations of the subject matter.
12. (right) Constable, The Haywain, 1812
style:
describe the long-ranging significance of the style and subject
matter of this work.
Part 3 - Compare/Contrast. Indicate the style of the following,
then construct an essay that compares and contrasts the stylistic
characteristics, historical context, subject matter and any pertinent
personal or theoretical viewpoints of the respective artists. Indicate
the style here; write the essays in your blue book. WRITE IN ESSAY
FORM!!! You may use the space below each set to organize your thoughts
or list key points before you begin writing your essay.
13. (left) Courbet, Stonebreakers, ca. 1849 vs. style: (right)
Millais, Christ in the House of His Parents
- style for each:
- style characteristics for each: (what about this work makes
it this style?)
- historical context for each: (what was going on in history/culture
of artistÍs country that might relate to this work?)
- subject matter for each: (how is the subject matter significant
vis-ö-vis the context, the style, the theory?)
- personal stuff for each: (how did the artist work? did he go
somewhere or do research for this work? did he make some sort
of innovation?)
- theoretical stuff for each: (did artist have a specific goal
he was trying to achieve? was artist trying to affect change?
did artist have a specific theory for his style and/or subject
matter? did artist have some kind of "beef?")
14. (left) Gericault, Raft of the Medusa, 1826 vs. style:
(right) Goya, May 3, 1808, 1814.
- style:
- style characteristics:
- historical context:
- subject matter:
- personal stuff:
- theoretical stuff:
|